You: Hi.. I am Dr
X, what can I do for you today?
Patient: Uhhh...
my boyfriend and I were... uhhh, you know... (silence)
You: Yes...
Patient: My
boyfriend and I were having sex and... (silence)
You: Uh-hu....
Patient: You
know, he didn't pull out on time. (in soft voice)
Boyfriend: I told
you do move, but you didn't move! (Obviously angry)
Patient: Shut up!
Do you think I want to be here?
You: It's OK, no need to argue. You want to make sure you don't get pregnant, correct?
Patient: YES !!
That's right doc. You gotta help me. I am going to school, work 2 jobs, my mom
is going to kill me and .... and....
You get the idea!
Emergency
contraception is one of those issues that sound simple, but it is not. Matching
the right method to the right patient requires some understanding of the
pharmacology of these agents and also knowing more about your patient's
history. Here is a review from this months, NEJM. Enjoy!
Oral
emergency contraceptive pills are the most commonly used form of emergency
contraception. Two regimens are currently marketed in the United States:
ulipristal acetate (30 mg) and levonorgestrel (1.5 mg). In 39 clinical trials
that included a combined total of more than 18,000 women, rates of pregnancy
after use of one of these two regimens ranged from 0 to 6.5%. Interpretation of
these numbers is problematic because the likelihood of pregnancy in the absence
of emergency contraception was not directly assessed; estimates that were based
on the days of the menstrual cycle on which the participants had sex suggest
that use of each of these regimens reduces the risk of pregnancy after a single
sex act by 40 to 90%. In the United States, products containing 1.5 mg of
levonorgestrel in one tablet may legally be sold over the counter to women and
men of all ages. Although the ulipristal regimen was recently approved for
nonprescription sale in Europe, it still requires a prescription in the United
States; consequently, use of this regimen in the United States is limited. Some
but not all data suggest reduced efficacy of the levonorgestrel regimen in
obese women with BMI’s as low as 25. If you think about it, it is not that
much!
The
levonorgestrel regimen is effective for at least 4 or 5 days after sex but may
be more effective the sooner it is taken; data on the ulipristal regimen have
not indicated a decrease in efficacy through 120 hours after sex. However,
since both regimens work largely by delaying or inhibiting ovulation, and since
women are usually unaware of whether ovulation is imminent, prompt use is
prudent. Neither of these two oral emergency contraceptive regimens has any
recognized contraindications.
The
most effective form of emergency contraception is the copper IUD. A review of
42 studies showed that, of 7034 women who received IUDs up to 10 days after
unprotected sex, only 0.09% subsequently became pregnant. Recent analyses
suggest that the IUD is effective for emergency contraception throughout the
menstrual cycle and can be inserted at any point if pregnancy is ruled out. A
key advantage of the IUD over oral emergency contraceptive pills is that the
IUD can provide ongoing contraception for at least 10 years. Almost all women
can safely use an IUD for emergency contraception; the only recognized
contraindications are pregnancy, cancer of the genital tract, uterine
malformation preventing device placement, copper allergy, mucopurulent
cervicitis, current pelvic inflammatory disease, and known current cervical
infection with chlamydia or gonorrhea. These conditions can be reasonably ruled
out on the basis of interview, examination, and, if indicated, pregnancy test;
routine testing for cervical infection is not necessary.
No
deaths or serious complications have been causally linked to either oral
emergency contraception regimen. Previous studies over the past decades have
not revealed adverse effects of levonorgestrel exposure during pregnancy on
either the woman or the conceptus. Data on ulipristal exposure during pregnancy
are limited, but combined data from postmarketing surveillance and clinical
trials showed that among 232 pregnancies with a known outcome in which the
woman and conceptus were exposed to ulipristal, no teratogenic effects were
seen. The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease after IUD insertion is less
than 5% even when the device is inserted through an infected cervix; whether
IUD insertion itself increases this incidence has not been definitively
established. IUD insertion can be uncomfortable, and some women have vaginal
bleeding and cramping after insertion. In the one published study of IUD
insertion for emergency contraception, which was conducted in community
clinics, the IUD insertion attempt was unsuccessful in 18% of women; this
proportion is higher than that reported in clinical trials of IUD insertion for
routine contraception.
Key points:
- IDU is the king of emergency contraception. However, not for all women.
- Oral hormonal options, mainly levonogestrel and ulipristal, have failure rates that vary from 0-6%.
- Women with higher BMI's are at risk for failure of the oral forms.
- The sooner you take them, the better.
- It is good to have a plan C and D, when B doesn't work.
No comments:
Post a Comment